Letter from Brownbackistan
excerpt, Thomas Frank, HARPER’S MAGAZINE / JULY 2012
[...]
Kansas, let’s recall, gained a reputation in recent decades for its bold sorties
against the twin abominations of evolution and abortion. Yet today, with its
most sincere culture warrior in the governor’s chair, matters of the soul
have somehow slipped off the legislative agenda. Sure, there is an occasional fusillade leveled at the state’s few remaining abortion providers. But for the most part, Kansas is concerned
with economic issues—which is to say,
with pleasing the corporate class. How
can this best be accomplished? What
can the state do to bring some jobcreating magic to the lone prairie?
Well, for one thing, Kansas can
drastically reduce its personal income
tax and its corporate income tax, a
measure passed by the legislature in
May. To refine its tax-cutting methods, the governor’s team brought in
the widely discredited economist Arthur Laffer, who coauthored a booklet
in 2007 exhorting states to compete
with each other to win the favor of
the nation’s businesses. And with
Laffer on board, the conservatives
began talking up their pet fantasia:
the best way to increase tax revenues
is to cut taxes.
If you are familiar with the annals
of the real, you might be aware that
this doesn’t work. Even though they
bowed beseechingly to the business
community, Presidents Reagan and
Bush Junior both learned that tax cuts
lead to less tax revenue, not more. And
in both cases, their supply-side voodoo
plunged the U.S. government into
deep deficits. But hey, what’s wrong
with that? Cutting taxes has plenty of
other things going for it: allowing, for
example, a certain generous Wichita
billionaire to keep that much more of
his gross income. And once tax revenue has cratered, Brownback (or whoever succeeds him) will be more or less
forced to shrink the state’s recalcitrant,
Darwin-worshipping educational establishment....
go read